Working Papers
Presented at UMN-UW International/Macro Student Workshop 2024
Abstract:
This paper studies the effects of disclosure regulation on firms' decisions to go public, invest, and raise external financing. Using a sample of IPO and similar private US firms, I find that firms going public increase investment and sales growth, borrow in longer maturity, and become more profitable relative to private firms. These results are amplified after disclosure tightening linked to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Motivated by these empirical findings, I develop a private information model where firms can go public subject to unobservable preference shocks. Both private and public firms have access to profitable investment opportunities that can be financed with either short- or long-term debt. I use the model to decompose the effects of changes in disclosure regulations on firm outcomes, distinguishing between intensive (treatment) and extensive (selection) margins. Tighter disclosure rules incentivize better-quality firms to go public, increase investment, and lengthen debt maturity. The model derives important policy implications: treatment and selection effects of disclosure tightening may produce opposing outcomes when adverse selection is more relevant.